
Are You Losing Yardage? Dr. Paul Wood Reveals Surprising Data on Curving vs. Straight Drives
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Summary
In this conversation, Dr. Paul Wood discusses the evolution of golf performance data, the importance of shot shapes, and the biomechanics involved in hitting draws and fades. He emphasizes the significance of understanding face angle and path in relation to performance, and how modern technology like Trackman has transformed data collection in golf. The discussion also touches on the psychological aspects of shot shape consistency, the measurement of angle of attack in wedge play, and the future of golf performance measurement.
Takeaways
- The evolution of golf performance data has significantly changed since 2005.
- Trackman technology has revolutionized how we understand golf swings.
- There is a debate on whether consistent shot shapes are better than straight shots.
- Jack Nicklaus highlighted the challenges of hitting straight shots.
- Biomechanics do not favor one shot shape over another.
- Data shows no correlation between face to path and shot shape consistency.
- Hitting straight shots generally yields better performance outcomes.
- Psychological factors play a crucial role in shot shape preference.
- Wedge play and angle of attack are critical for effective short game performance.
- The future of golf performance measurement lies in linking lab data with on-course performance.