• Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

  • 2023/07/26
  • 再生時間： 16 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • In this episode, we look at the issue of unjust enrichment and the stultification (blocking or interference with) of public policy defence. In one corner, Lord Burrows (for the majority) argues a restitutionary remedy is sufficiently distinct to avoid stultifying legislation about public contracts. In the other, Lord Briggs of Westbourne argues that public policy should win out over restitution. Who is right?


    Link to case: [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

    Legal Style Blog homepage


    Twitter: @legalstyleblog


    E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk


    Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

In this episode, we look at the issue of unjust enrichment and the stultification (blocking or interference with) of public policy defence. In one corner, Lord Burrows (for the majority) argues a restitutionary remedy is sufficiently distinct to avoid stultifying legislation about public contracts. In the other, Lord Briggs of Westbourne argues that public policy should win out over restitution. Who is right?


Link to case: [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

Legal Style Blog homepage


Twitter: @legalstyleblog


E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk


Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations
続きを読む 一部表示

Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&Tに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。