
Auto-mation: A System named Efficiency Omits Judgment and Precision
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
The story of Hertz's autonomous rental system is explained in this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum. Initially meant to simplify fleet management, the technology spiraled into a mechanism for arbitrary prosecutions.
A NASA contractor held at gunpoint, a veteran arrested before his wedding, and a nurse apprehended at a border crossing years later are just a few of the striking case studies showing how a system named efficiency promised automation but reflected a deeper abandonment of human judgment.
This episode considers the outsourcing of institutional trust to opaque algorithms that mistook logistical uncertainty for criminal intent draws on the work of Tarleton Gillespie and Neil Postman's criticism of Technopoly.
Hertz was finally compelled to face its defective system in late 2022 for $168 million after a series of civil lawsuits and regulatory investigations that started in 2019 and extended through 2021.
As mainstream logics rapidly become dependent on data analytics, this story is a cautionary tale about presuming automation means error-free. The episode further offers an invitation to restore responsible human guidance and oversight of systems.