The great science broadcaster and author Jay Ingram joins me once again to talk about science that goes mainstream. Why does do some topics jump out of dedicated science news channels and how should critics respond? Is there any good way to present the process behind science and why is that crucial for critiques of misleading stories. These are some of the topics we explore and Jay provides some positive examples of efforts to communicate the changing nature and long term vision of scientific research.

We pose many questions about how best to tell science stories and not all were answered but just like research, communication is an ever evolving thing as well. Let me know what you think about science media and where you'd like to see change.

This is the only link you need to subscribe to Two Brad For You. Please do rate and review it really helps us out.

If you'd like to support the show with currency click here. We are grateful for that too. Finally, you can check out the website here.

Many thanks to Freak Motif for the music and Sebastian Abboud for the logo.

• Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission
• Yes, Social Media Really Is a Cause of the Epidemic of Teenage Mental Illness - Jonathan Haidt
• The great rewiring: is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness?
• Unsettled science on social media - Science
• Defy Dementia Podcast