Judgemental - a psychologist and a lawyer walk into a bar

著者: Greg Smith and Kate Connors
  • サマリー

  • An analysis of all things psychosocial risk, from psychological studies to legal proceedings and case law.
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

An analysis of all things psychosocial risk, from psychological studies to legal proceedings and case law.
エピソード
  • A special episode: The High Court decision – Adam Elisha v Vision Australia
    2025/02/24
    Join Kate and Greg as they regroup for a conversation in the bar to discuss the recent High Court decision in the Adam Elisha v Vision Australia case. This case was initially discussed in Episode 4, when the conversation was recorded from a LinkedIn live event Kate & Greg hosted in early 2024.In this episode, Greg summarises the High Court’s decision and distils the legal technicalities into manageable bite sized chunks – extremely helpful for those who find legal technicalities hard to digest! A summary? The High Court concluded that Mr Elisha’s loss was not “too remote”, and the precise psychiatric injury he suffered did not need to have been foreseen at the time the contract was entered.Greg provides listeners with legal takeaways that, in no surprise to Greg, Kate did not find inspiring or comforting in her quest for psychological injuries and their severity to be reduced in today’s workplaces. But none-the-less, the discussion provides another perfect opportunity for the legal and psychological sides of psychosocial risk management to be meaningfully discussed in a bar-side chat.Choose your drink, settle down and listen in to this special episode that not only concludes the Elisha v Vision Australia matter, but also brings Series 1 to a close. Stay tuned for Series 2.- A review and discussion of an article published by Paulinet Tamaray in the Human Resources Director magazine, “Frustrated worker blames understaffing for aggressive behaviour”.- The challenges for employers in balancing workload management with understaffing in a challenging labour market- Considerations for employers on how to best identify workload challenges and some suggested tips to support workers Connect with us:LinkedIn – Kate ConnorsLinkedIn – Greg SmithLinkedIn – Karolina DobsonLinkedIn – EMLLinkedIn – Mutual Benefits Program Resources:The High Court decision paper - https://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/downloadPdf/2024/HCA/50Elemental Psychology & Coaching websiteGreg Smith – Safety Books Proving Safety and Paper SafeEML websiteEML Psychosocial resources – Mutual Benefitshttps://www.eml.com.au/news-community/latest-news/reduce-psychosocial-risks-in-workplaces/ Follow Judgemental: A psychologist and a lawyer walk into a barSpotifyAppleAmazon This podcast series is proudly sponsored by EML. As Australia’s largest personal injury claims provider, EML provide services to the workers compensation, life insurance and CTP personal injury markets. For over 110-years, the EML Group has proudly helped people get their lives back after a workplace injury or illness.The Mutual Benefits program reinvests a portion of EML profits into innovative products, tools, initiatives and services that are designed to improve outcomes for employers, injured workers, and the communities we support.​Click here for the free resources available within the Mutual Benefit program to support psychosocial risk management in the workplace.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Applying traditional approaches to psychological injury in the workplace – have we been barking up the wrong tree?
    2024/12/05
    It’s time for Kate & Greg to wax lyrical about one of the most challenging psychosocial risks – interpersonal conflict. Thankfully, the article published on LinkedIn by Karolina Dobson, referencing a study by Gutierrez & Bazeley (2006) brings an evidence base and helpful frameworks into the conversation so it doesn’t wander too far off track!Once again, the complexity of managing psychosocial risk is highlighted in this fascinating conversation. Are all psychosocial risks of equal “risk”? Are all conflicts of equal “risk”? And how do organisations navigate the reality that, just like with stress – not all conflict is harmful, and not all individuals have the same tolerance or response to conflict. Can’t we all just be “adults” and sort it out between ourselves when conflict arises? If only it was that simple….If you are of drinking age and inclination, this is probably an episode where pouring yourself a standard measure of your favourite tonic will complement the conversation nicely.- A review and discussion of Karolina Dobson’s LinkedIn Article, “Applying traditional approaches to psychological injury in the workplace: Have we been barking up the wrong tree?”- Discussion of the research paper by Gutierrez, R and Bazely, P (2006). Workplace Psychological Injury: A Mixed Methods Investigation Into Workers' Compensation Claims.- The balance of healthy conflict and unhealthy conflict. Is all conflict in the workplace harmful?- Interpersonal conflict vs interpersonalised conflict Connect with us:LinkedIn – Kate ConnorsLinkedIn – Greg SmithLinkedIn – Karolina DobsonLinkedIn – EMLLinkedIn – Mutual Benefits Program Resources:“Applying traditional approaches to psychological injury in the workplace – have we been barking up the wrong tree?” - Karolina Dobson, 2024 Published in: LinkedInElemental Psychology & Coaching websiteGreg Smith – Safety Books Proving Safety and Paper SafeEML websiteEML Psychosocial resources – Mutual Benefitshttps://www.eml.com.au/news-community/latest-news/reduce-psychosocial-risks-in-workplaces/ Follow Judgemental: A psychologist and a lawyer walk into a barSpotifyAppleAmazon This podcast series is proudly sponsored by EML. As Australia’s largest personal injury claims provider, EML provide services to the workers compensation, life insurance and CTP personal injury markets. For over 110-years, the EML Group has proudly helped people get their lives back after a workplace injury or illness.The Mutual Benefits program reinvests a portion of EML profits into innovative products, tools, initiatives and services that are designed to improve outcomes for employers, injured workers, and the communities we support.​Click here for the free resources available within the Mutual Benefit program to support psychosocial risk management in the workplace.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    47 分
  • The Vision Australia Cases
    2024/11/28
    Join Kate & Greg for a special episode, where the conversation was recorded from a LinkedIn live event from early in 2024.The focus of this episode is to discuss a High Court decision that examines an employer’s duty of care to manage the psychosocial risk of organisational justice, during employment termination decisions and processes. During the conversation the importance of employers taking reasonable action to meaningfully protect and maintain duty of care – particularly when observable signs and symptoms of psychological distress are evident in the employee. Combine that with clear evidence of the deterioration of leadership support, and the complexity of mitigating against the harm that can be caused in organisational justice processes and procedures, particularly when the trust between an employee and their employer is broken, and we have the basis for another interesting conversation.Whether you grab a cuppa (or something stronger), choose your liquid and settle into the virtual bar for another conversation on the complexity of psychosocial risk management. Connect with us:LinkedIn – Kate ConnorsLinkedIn – Greg SmithLinkedIn – EMLLinkedIn – Mutual Benefits Program Resources:Elisha v Vision Australia Limited M22/2024 - High Court MaterialVision Australia Ltd v Elisha [No 2] [2023] VSCA 288 (28 November 2023) - AppealElisha v Vision Australia Ltd [2022] VSC 754 (13 December 2022) - First instanceElemental Psychology & Coaching websiteGreg Smith – Safety Books Proving Safety and Paper SafeEML websiteEML Psychosocial resources – Mutual Benefitshttps://www.eml.com.au/news-community/latest-news/reduce-psychosocial-risks-in-workplaces/ Follow Judgemental: A psychologist and a lawyer walk into a barSpotifyAppleAmazon This podcast series is proudly sponsored by EML. As Australia’s largest personal injury claims provider, EML provide services to the workers compensation, life insurance and CTP personal injury markets. For over 110-years, the EML Group has proudly helped people get their lives back after a workplace injury or illness.The Mutual Benefits program reinvests a portion of EML profits into innovative products, tools, initiatives and services that are designed to improve outcomes for employers, injured workers, and the communities we support.​Click here for the free resources available within the Mutual Benefit program to support psychosocial risk management in the workplace.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    49 分

Judgemental - a psychologist and a lawyer walk into a barに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。