
Metrics in Software Engineering: Friend or Foe? | Episode 14
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Metrics aren’t the problem. You are.
For years, engineers have hated metrics, but what if the real issue isn’t the numbers… it’s how they’re used?
In this episode, Duncan Mapes and Jason Ehmke dig into why many engineers roll their eyes at metrics, the traps leaders fall into when measuring productivity, and how to shift the conversation toward continuous improvement.
They challenge conventional thinking, arguing that metrics can transform engineering culture if leaders stop using them as surveillance tools. They break down how to measure without micromanaging, why team-level data beats individual stats, and how metrics can expose, not punish, weak spots in your delivery process.
Top Takeaways:
- Metrics in software engineering are often misunderstood and misused.
- Engineers typically resist being measured due to a fear of scrutiny.
- Effective metrics should focus on outcomes, not just activity.
- Continuous improvement is essential for enhancing team performance.
- Team-level metrics are more valuable than individual metrics.
- Data should be used to identify bottlenecks and improve processes.
- Transparency in metrics fosters trust and collaboration within teams.
- Asking the right questions can uncover valuable insights.
- Metrics should drive conversations about improvement, not blame.
- A culture of measurement can lead to better outcomes and happier customers.
Connect with us:
Duncan Mapes
Jason Ehmke
DevGrid.io
DevGrid on LinkedIn
DevGrid on X