Chemical safety: sounds straightforward, right? You’ve got your SDS, PPE, and eyewash stations. But what happens when your team mixes, sprays, or supercharges those chemicals in ways the manufacturer never imagined? With a CHMM on the mic, this is part coaching, part humor, and 100% actionable.

Key Takeaways –

1. The SDS might not be helpful based on how youre using the chemical.

• Reality check: Most Safety Data Sheets are written based on lab conditions and "intended use"—not how your sanitation team might be using them.
• Pro Tip: Ask yourself, “Was this SDS written by someone who’s ever worn PPE, on a harvest room floor, at 2 AM?” Maybe not.

2. Exposure Limits Are Great—If You Can Measure Them

• Common failure: SDS says “use respirator if above X ppm.” Great. Now… how are you measuring ppm in your facility?
• Real examples:
  • No meter for that specific chemical
  • Using outdated Dräger tubes that are non-specific

3. “More Isn’t Better”

• Scenario: You double the chemical strength during deep cleaning due to finding some "buggies." Now your PPE, risk profile, engineering controls—all need to change. Did they?
• Surprise consequences:
• Equipment degradation because the stronger solution wasn’t considered $$$
• PPE may not be adequate for the levels used

4. Training Misses the Human Factor

• You’ve trained on:
  • Where the SDS is
  • How to handle and/or mix
  • Which PPE to wear
• But you forgot to train on:
  • What happens when the goggles fog up
  • That instinctive move to scratch your eye with a gloved hand
  • Spraying above your head and having chemical rain down your back

5. Eyewash Stations: Functional on First Shift, ???? On Off Shifts

• Classic issue: “We check them every Monday at 9 AM.” But chemical use spikes on nights, weekends, and during deep cleans
• Also overlooked:
  • Eyewashes with scalding hot water
  • No eyewash where non-routine chemical usage occurs

Actionable Advice :

• Revisit every chemical on-site: How is it used, applied, stored, and disposed? Does that match the SDS?
• Evaluate your meters: Can you measure the chemical levels you're basing levels of PPE on?
• Update PPE assessments based on how chemicals are used
• Retrain your teams with realistic, scenario-based walk-throughs
• Audit all eyewash stations across all shifts, all departments, and all rarely used rooms

Final Words from Joe & Jen:

• We’re not saying you have these problems. We’re saying we’ve seen them—a lot.
• These gaps sneak in when paperwork replaces field observations.
• If you need help identifying these gaps, we do onsite audits, coaching, and training at AllenSafety.com and AllenSafetyCoaching.com.

SEO Keywords:

chemical safety podcast, SDS compliance issues, chemical exposure training, industrial PPE assessment, worker safety podcast, sanitation safety gaps, confined space chemical hazards, OSHA chemical safety, eyewash station audit, Allen Safety podcast, real-world safety training, fogged goggles chemical hazard, how to evaluate chemical PPE, manufacturing plant chemical safety, sanitation audit best practices, CHMM podcast

Welcome to the cage match no one talks about—but everyone in food and meat production lives through. This week, Joe and Jen are tackling the heavyweight showdown between two giants in every facility: Worker Safety vs. Food Safety. Who takes priority when things go sideways? Who gets to call the shots when it’s time to shut it all down? And most importantly—how do we keep from shutting down the whole operation when both teams are “just trying to do their job”?

If you’ve ever sat in a Thursday morning sanitation meeting and realized you now need PPE, a tie-off plan, confined space permits, and a miracle—this episode is for you. Joe and Jen don’t sugarcoat the chaos that can erupt when worker safety and food safety don’t align. Instead, they break it down and offer real-world, practical solutions that facilities can use right now to reduce friction, protect workers, and still keep compliant with every letter of the USDA, FDA, OSHA, and whatever other acronym is looming over your clipboard.

🧠 What You’ll Learn:
🥊 The Source of the Conflict
Why worker safety and food safety frequently butt heads, even though both are trying to “do the right thing”

How different regulatory agencies (OSHA vs USDA/FDA) create a confusing tug-of-war in decision-making

The emotional toll and operational cost of "shut it all down" moments when there's no clear prioritization

🔧 Tactical Takeaways (You Can Use Today)
How to create a shared 5-point conflict matrix between food safety and worker safety—before things go wrong

Identifying “hot zones” in your plant: Anywhere you have elevated work + sanitation + guarding + QA reps = Risk

Flashlight = red flag. What this simple tool tells you about potential violations and future downtime

Why Tuesday-Wednesday is when worker safety needs to be in the loop—not Friday morning at 7AM

How to conduct a 15-minute “risk walk” to spot top hazards without spending your whole shift doing audits

🧠 SEO Keywords (Built for Search Engines AND Humans):
Worker Safety vs Food Safety

Conflicts in Food Processing Facilities

Sanitation and Safety Alignment

Safety Risk Assessments in Manufacturing

Flashlight Confined Space Incidents

Food Safety Chemicals and PPE

Safety Planning for Food Plant Sanitation

Cross-Functional Safety Planning

FSQR and EHS Collaboration

Elevated Work and Fall Protection in Food Plants

Chemical Testing Safety Procedures

Risk Walk Safety Audits

How to Prioritize Safety in a Food Manufacturing Plant

🎁 Resources Mentioned:
✅ AllenSafety.com – For on-site coaching, plant assessments, and in-person training
✅ AllenSafetyCoaching.com – Free email coaching, 100+ exclusive commercial-free training videos, virtual courses, and support

🙏 Support the Podcast:
If you’ve ever dodged a falling flashlight, begged for a last-minute scissor lift, or gotten blindsided by a 7AM Thursday meeting, this podcast was made for you.

👍 Like, subscribe, and share with your safety/QA teams
📨 Submit your questions or conflict scenarios
💸 We don’t make money on this—but your clicks help us push content to the folks who really need it

This video is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific circumstances.

Allen Safety takes a deep dive into SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) reviews, the blurry overlap of responsibility between teams, and why most documentation isn’t as airtight—or as collaborative—as it should be. The hosts challenge listeners to reconsider how procedures are developed, who reviews them, and how safety personnel can truly become competent stakeholders in the systems they’re expected to sign off on.

This is more than just a compliance checkbox conversation—it’s a real-world, boots-on-the-ground look at the messy middle of safety documentation, with clear, tactical solutions for bridging the gaps.

Your SOPs Might Be a Frankenstein of Mismatched Formats
SOPs are often written by third parties, recycled from other plants, or poorly updated.

Reviewers Don’t Always Know What They’re Looking For
Reviewers are often engineers or refrigeration/maintenance techs, not safety experts.

Emergency Procedures are Too Generic
SOPs frequently assume “perfect world” conditions.

Safety Needs a Seat at the Table—Early
SOPs, task procedures, PPE assessments, and LOTO protocols must all align—and often, they don’t.

Task Procedures Without Collaboration = Injuries Waiting to Happen
If safety writes procedures without consulting maintenance—or vice versa—hazards will be missed.

The Fix: Cross-Discipline Collaboration + Job Shadowing
Build SOPs and task procedures in multi-disciplinary teams—safety, engineering, maintenance in the same room.

History Matters: Use Veteran Operators as Historians
New team? High turnover? Nobody remembers the last snowstorm or failure event?

Don’t Forget Environmental Compliance (RMP)
RMP (Risk Management Plans) are increasingly under scrutiny.

Final Thoughts & Call to Action:
If you’re managing safety, you’re not just pushing paper—you’re writing the playbook for survival. And that means getting out of the silo, out of the office, and into the field with your engineering and maintenance teams. Safety, SOPs, and real operations need to speak the same language—or someone gets hurt.

Want help?
Allen Safety offers:

Onsite PSM audits & compliance coaching
Safety-PSM joint training
Online access to over 100 commercial-free training episodes
Unlimited email coaching with the team

Visit AllenSafety.com or AllenSafetyCoaching.com to learn more.
Process Safety & Compliance
Process Safety Management (PSM)

OSHA PSM compliance
EPA RMP (Risk Management Plan)
Mechanical integrity
PSM documentation review
PSM audit best practices
Process Hazard Analysis (PHA)
Emergency shutdown procedures

Does your facility use this tool that creates over-looked safety risks?

Episode Summary:
In this episode of Safe, Efficient, Profitable: A Worker Safety Podcast, Joe and Jen Allen put a spotlight om an overlooked source of workplace injuries: hose handling. While hoses are a staple tool across manufacturing, sanitation, and agricultural facilities, the hosts reveal practices and conditions that can lead to significant injuries.

Through real-world examples, the episode breaks down the top hose-handling opportunities, encouraging safety professionals and plant management to evaluate their cleaning processes to see if any of these risks are at their facility.


Ready to evaluate your facility’s hose risks? Allen Safety offers on-site and virtual coaching for sanitation safety evaluations. Visit AllenSafetyCoaching.com or Allen-Safety.com to connect with our team. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe so more teams can eliminate hose hazards before injuries happen.

Key Topics Covered:
⚠️ One of the top underestimated injury sources
🪜 Hose handling at elevation
🔥 Hot water
💪 Ergonomics
🧼 Partial washdowns and product changeovers
🚫 Training
💡 Storage and transport risks
🧪 Chemical vs. water
🧤 Nozzle problems
☔ Spray angle
✅ Practical solutions
🔍 Behavior-based audits

SEO Keywords:
hose handling safety, sanitation injuries, chemical hose risk, ergonomic hazards, workplace water pressure injury, cleaning injury prevention, hose safety training, sanitation safety audits, ladder hose hazard, scissor lift hose use, PPE hose spray, Allen Safety coaching, behavioral safety in sanitation, worker injury prevention, cleaning safety podcast

This video is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney , safety, or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific circumstances.

In this episode we're picking the top hot work safety risks that we've encountered over our careers that can create the perfect storm for a fire event during hot work activities, with luck playing a major role in why some buildings are still standing. Give this episode a listen, and see if your facility has any of these hot work process management risks:

“Top Failures in Hot Work Safety – Not Your Typical Toolbox Talk”

🔥 Overview:

In episode of Safe, Efficient, Profitable, hosts Joe and Jen of Allen Safety go beyond the basics of hot work training to uncover the top failures in hot work safety programs—the kind that can literally burn your facility down if left unaddressed. Forget the standard "check your extinguisher" talk—this is a real-world, experience-driven deep dive based on years of safety audits, incidents, and lessons learned on the ground.

This episode is a must-listen for safety professionals, plant managers, contractors, and fire watch personnel looking to prevent catastrophic fire risks during welding, cutting, and grinding operations.

🔥 Key Points Covered:

Fire Watch Confusion

Many Fire Watch personnel don’t understand where to stand, how long to stay, or how to follow the work if it moves.

Most training doesn’t address real-world logistics or site-specific protocols.

Undefined Hot Work Areas

Critical visibility issues arise when Fire Watch personnel are nowhere near the hot work.

Real examples include watching welding work 50+ feet away or in confined spaces—ineffective and dangerous.

Incomplete Permit Processes

Hot work permits are often pre-filled, not site-specific, or treated as blanket 8-hour approvals.

There’s a lack of accountability around evaluating new locations, travel paths, and potential hazards as work progresses.

Distance & Multiple Weld Zones

Welding that spans 200+ feet of conveyor systems or fencing requires multiple permits and Fire Watch assignments, not just one.

Permits need to consider clearance areas (35 feet around each weld), extinguisher placement, and actual work duration.

Shift Transitions & Breakdowns in Fire Watch Coverage

Contractor Liability Gaps

Confusion over who is liable—contractor vs. host site—especially when personnel change mid-project.

This opens the door for unapproved hand-offs, missed hazards, and untracked accountability.

The Root of It All: Lack of Planning

Most issues stem from a lack of project planning.

Pre-job assessments are rushed or overlooked, especially for multi-employer worksites.

Without the right number and quality of trained personnel, hazards slip through the cracks.

🔍 SEO Keywords & Phrases:

Hot work safety failures
Fire watch best practices
Welding permit compliance
Preventing fires during hot work
Hot work hazard assessment
Allen Safety podcast
Industrial fire prevention
Safety planning for contractors
Toolbox talk hot work
OSHA hot work permit
Real-world fire watch training

💡 Final Takeaway:
“Hot work safety is about way more than checking extinguishers—it’s about people, planning, positioning, and responsibility.”
If your team is unclear on any of those, it’s time to revisit your program.

🎯 For More Support:

Visit AllenSafety.com for onsite training and safety services.

Explore AllenSafetyCoaching.com for virtual coaching, resources, and free email support.

This episode is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific

Working at Farms, feed lots, and feed mills. They are absolutely an "if you know you know" type work place, which can create some risks if that person becomes a new hire! In this episode, Joe and Jen skip right over some of the more "traditional" Hazards and move right to things that make you go "huh."🤔 This was a fun one to make- we hope you guys enjoy it! Full episode summary below:

Key Points:
1. Biosecurity & Industrial Hygiene
Farm safety starts before driving onto the property—biosecurity measures require washing vehicles, showering in/showering out, wearing designated clothing, and sanitizing tools.

2. Safety Challenges in Farming Environments
Hot Work (e.g., welding, grinding) is unique on farms due to open spaces, uncontrollable factors like ventilation, and farm managers (rather than safety officers) issuing permits.
Training is often unrealistic—safety training (e.g., first aid/CPR) is typically taught in an office setting but must be applied in unpredictable farm conditions (e.g., near animals, in extreme weather, in remote locations).
Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) issues—farms have stored energy hazards (e.g., augers retaining power), which may not be adequately addressed through standard LOTO procedures.
3. Equipment-Specific Hazards
Leaf blowers pose a unique risk—they can catch long hair or loose clothing, an overlooked danger due to differences in PPE use on farms versus industrial sites.
Tractors and equipment can vary significantly—workers may have to operate multiple brands and models, requiring flexible and adaptable training.
Outdoor work adds risks—workers may be alone, exposed to extreme weather, or using outdated PPE/equipment.
4. Routine Tasks Can Be High-Risk
Pest control, handling chemicals, and general hygiene practices pose hidden risks—workers may unintentionally contaminate themselves (e.g., scratching their nose while wearing contaminated gloves).
People that have been at the faciality for many years may be accustomed to certain risks—they may develop unsafe habits over time due to familiarity with their tasks and environment.
5. Emergency Preparedness & Response
Fires, tornadoes, and medical emergencies require special planning since farms are often rural and lack immediate emergency response access.
During emergencies, animals must also be managed—creating additional logistical and safety concerns.
Returning to normal operations post-emergency is often overlooked—many farm safety plans lack a structured approach for resuming work safely.
6. Housekeeping & Sanitation Differences
Housekeeping expectations vary by farm type—some areas (e.g., mills) must be cobweb-free, while feedlots prioritize biosecurity.
Inspection routines should be tailored to each location—ensuring electrical panels, PPE, and equipment cleanliness meet site-specific safety standards.
Contractors & maintenance personnel need clear guidance—a well-planned inspection and task list can prevent biosecurity risks when bringing in external workers.
7. The Need for Better Training & Documentation
Farm safety programs should be location-specific, as no two farms operate the same way. The training should be accessible at the farm- and not just at the main office.

For more information, they direct listeners to AllenSafetyCoaching.com or Allen-Safety.com websites for training, evaluations, and audits tailored to farm safety.

This video is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific circumstances.

We've all seen the boiler-plate electrical safe work practice & electrical awareness training. This isn't that. In this episode, we're challenging your program, what's covered in training, who gets training, and even your routine safety inspections to give you a fresh way to view electrical safety at your facility. If this helped you, please support us by liking and sharing the episode and thank you for listening! Full episode description below:

This episode dives deep into common electrical hazards overlooked during inspections and audits, highlighting critical gaps in personal protective equipment (PPE), voltmeter use, and general facility maintenance. By emphasizing real-world scenarios, the hosts discuss how to strengthen electrical safety programs through collaborative efforts with electricians, maintenance and utilities departments. The episode is packed with actionable advice and key insights for improving electrical safety.

Key Points:
1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Gaps:
Improper use of arc flash clothing and untrained staff wearing non-rated clothing.
Specific Concerns: Workers rolling up sleeves, incorrectly washing arc flash clothing, and mismatches in PPE due to gaps in supply and policy oversight.

2. Voltmeter Training and Misuse:
Untrained or insufficiently trained personnel using voltmeters improperly, leading to dangerous arcing incidents.
Training Gaps: Inconsistent policies on who should use voltmeters and when they should check for power.

3. Environmental Hazards in Electrical Rooms:
Water and Corrosion: MCC rooms often have water ingress issues due to poor drainage, condensation, or wet cleanup areas.
Impact: Water and chemical exposure can cause equipment failures and create shock hazards.

4. Dust and Explosive Risks:
Dust accumulation near electrical equipment (e.g., mills, conveyor systems) increases fire risk from ignition sources such as motors, bearings etc.

5. Safety Program Ownership:
Many safety programs are unclear and too vague or overly complex, with safety teams managing areas outside their expertise resulting in programs outlining processes the facility does not actually do.

6. Importance of Accurate Labeling:
Incorrect labeling of electrical panels and disconnects can lead to dangerous situations where hazard levels are misunderstood.

7. Collaborative Risk Assessments:
Engage electricians, maintenance staff, and safety teams in collaborative reviews and risk assessments tailored to specific locations.

Keywords:
Electrical safety hazards
PPE gaps in electrical work
Voltmeter safety training
Lockout/tagout electrical safety
Arc flash protection
MCC room maintenance
Electrical hazard inspections
Housekeeping for electrical safety
Dust explosion prevention
Industrial electrical safety program

This video is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific circumstances.

Specific job tasks shown are being completed by trained professionals, and should not be attempted without proper training and equipment under the supervision of a professional. Viewer discretion is advised.

Where will the top safety risks and threats fall in 2025? Joe and Jen throw out their predictions for 2025. Let us know in the comments what your predictions are!

1. The Continuation of Key 2024 Trends into 2025
The episode kicks off with a reflection on 2024’s biggest safety and compliance trends, including the growing complexity of safety protocols and the rise of multi-stakeholder involvement in documentation.
Predictions for 2025 include heightened emphasis on process ownership and the need for more specialized training amidst rising turnover rates.

2. Who Should Be Signing Off on Safety Documents?
Understanding Documentation Responsibility: The discussion highlights the challenges of ensuring that the right individuals are signing critical documents like PSM protocols, environmental safety validations, and lockout/tagout procedures.
Role-Based Validation: Different documents require different expertise.

3. The Importance of Qualifications and Expertise
The team stresses the need for honesty in evaluating one’s qualifications. Managers and employees alike must assess their ability to handle specific responsibilities, from evaluating tie-off points for elevated work to managing ammonia refrigeration systems.
They discuss scenarios where managers are assigned tasks outside their expertise, highlighting the risks of improper sign-offs and the need for ongoing technical training.

4. Addressing the Experience and Training Gap
As turnover rates rise and companies promote from within, a critical gap in industry-specific knowledge is emerging.

5. Process Safety Management (PSM) Challenges
The conversation touches on the growing complexity of PSM responsibilities and the struggle to assign ownership.
Many organizations are stretched thin, with roles like safety, environmental, and even HR managers taking on PSM duties without sufficient training.
The hosts emphasize the need for subject matter experts (SMEs) who understand the technical aspects of systems like thermodynamics and leak mitigation.

6. Why Document Signatures Matter
Signing off on a document is more than just an administrative step—it signifies ownership, responsibility, and accountability for safety and compliance.

7. Practical Solutions for Safety Challenges in 2025
The episode closes with practical advice for organizations facing these challenges:

Conduct evaluations of education and baseline knowledge to ensure the right people are signing critical documents. Develop training plans for onboarding.

Utilize personnel at sister plants, or location subject matter experts to help fill in knowledge gaps.

Call to Action:
This episode is packed with practical insights for professionals navigating the dynamic safety and regulatory challenges of 2025. For tailored support, visit AllenSafety.com or AllenSafetyCoaching.com to explore on-site evaluations and training options or access over 100 lessons on Allen Safety’s virtual coaching platform. If this episode was helpful, please like, subscribe, and share to help others stay informed and improve workplace safety!

This video is intended for educational purposes. Solutions offered are not designed to take the place of an attorney or medical professional, and should not be taken as legal or medical advice. It is recommended that viewers consult a safety consultant, medical provider or an occupational safety legal team as applicable to help navigate their specific circumstances.