『Spotlight: Failing to Science the Sh*t Out of Running / A Legal Lens on Liability and Sports Injury』のカバーアート

Spotlight: Failing to Science the Sh*t Out of Running / A Legal Lens on Liability and Sports Injury

Spotlight: Failing to Science the Sh*t Out of Running / A Legal Lens on Liability and Sports Injury

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

We kick off this Spotlight at the Western States 100, where much of the buzz centered on David Roche’s DNF. Roche, a polarizing figure who promised to “science the shit” out of the race, faced unfair criticism both before and after the race, and Ross reflects on how the scientific process often works best when the "hypothesis" fails, and why confronting failed hypotheses to explain under-performance is more beneficial than riding a wave of success .


The "science the shit out of it" theme continues with Nike’s hyped attempt to help Faith Kipyegon break the 4-minute mile. It didn’t just fall short—it missed by a long shot, with Kipyegon never really giving the barrier a scare with a pacing strategy that reveals they all knew it was not truly feasible. Ross and Gareth unpack the science, pseudoscience and "hacks" behind the effort, with honorable mentions for the obviously flawed claims by scientists about drafting benefits, and criticism of many media who parroted hype points without critical thought. We wonder what the athlete who could break 4 looks like, and postulate that they probably don't exist. Yet. From ultra to ultra-short, we shift to the 100m, where Kishane Thompson clocked a blistering 9.75s—the fastest in a decade, leading Gareth to wonder why sprinting seems to have plateaued post-Bolt?


In Center Stage (37:14), legal expert Matt Kemp joins us to dissect a recent rugby case where a player successfully sued an opponent for causing a spinal injury with a reckless off-the-ball collision. Could this open the door to more civil claims in contact sports? Matt explains the legal standards around recklessness and duty of care. Ross Replies (1:15:23) to Discourse member Paul on the purpose of sports science and what "truth" means when studies can't be replicated?


And in Listener Lens (1:24:15), we explore ATP's role in exercise, wonder whether you can ever “run out” of it, and how the purpose of metabolism is to keep it in good supply. And Finally (1:31:17), we invite you all to join our Tour de France Fantasy League, and see if you can top Gareth and Ross' picks in our two leagues!


Join Discourse


Join the Discourse community, to hang out with the racers, analysts, legal experts, coaches and experts, by making a small monthly pledge at Patreon


Links

  • Analysis of the 100m event that inspired our 100m chat
  • Gymnastic medalists are getting older
  • Report on the decision ruling in favour of a player injured by opponent
  • Matt, our new legal expert, is a partner at Becker Kemp Solicitors & Attorneys
  • Ross' reply to Tony on the ATP depletion question - members only
  • TDF FANTASY LEAGUE - play one of our two leagues

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Spotlight: Failing to Science the Sh*t Out of Running / A Legal Lens on Liability and Sports Injuryに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。