『The Charlie James Show Podcast』のカバーアート

The Charlie James Show Podcast

The Charlie James Show Podcast

著者: Audacy
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

The Charlie James Show originates from News/Talk 989 WORD, The Upstate's #1 Talk Station, weekdays 3-7pm. Charlie tackles the topics that matter to the Carolina's. He interviews the movers and shakers while letting listeners sound off on the news of the day.2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. 政治・政府
エピソード
  • The Charlie James Show on Thursday May 29 2025 - Hour 4 (6:00PM)
    2025/05/29
    Understand. I don't understand why the people at MSNBC don't get it. These network executives, they just don't understand what's going on. They don't know how to run a a media company. That's that's obvious. Now they fired Joy Reid at MSNBC. Okay. We were all okay with that. Nobody was crying over Joy Reid losing her job. The most racist person on on cable television. But they replaced her with probably the second whitest woman on the planet. Now we all know that Elizabeth Warren is the whitest woman in the world. In fact, she did a DNA test. That was so funny, because president Trump started calling her Pocahontas. So she went out and she got one of those DNA tests because she claimed that she was Native American. Even on her Texas bar license, she put down her race as Native American. She was listen. I forget which college she went through, but it but in in their list of dignitaries, they actually claimed that she was the first woman of color. What? If that color is ivory, then yes. So she's the she's the whitest woman on the planet. The second whitest woman on the planet is Jen Psaki. They replaced Joy Reid with Jen Psaki. Now I am shocked that activists all over the country didn't just lose their minds. I'm surprised that Al Sharpton didn't come out against MSNBC. I'm surprised that all of these people, E Elie Mistall, all these folks out there didn't just rise up against MSNBC because they replaced well, they didn't replace her, but they yeah. Well, they they fired Joy Reid. They promoted Jen Psaki. Well, now Jen Psaki is doing the Tuesday through Friday show in the 9PM time slot. That used to be and still kind of is Rachel Maddow's time slot. Now Rachel Maddow was doing the show for $25,000,000 a year. Five nights a week, one hour. Good gracious. I could do a one hour show standing on my head. And she went from 25,000,000, 5 nights a week. They cut her salary to 20,000,000, and she only does Monday nights. That's it. Now granted, she was on the air five nights a week during the first hundred days of the Trump administration, and she had to hate that. But could you imagine getting $20,000,000 a year to do a one hour a week show? I gotta talk to my agent. Man, that's some serious money there. Well, MSNBC's thought that they were doing something smart. They put gin sake on Tuesday through Friday, and that turns out to be a disaster. Just weeks after Emma this is from trending politics. Just weeks after MSNBC debuted its brand new prime time lineup in an attempt to salvage plummeting viewership. Audiences made clear their feelings about the direction, and it's not positive for the network. Over the course of May, the outlet has plummeted 41% in viewership in key demographics. That's not the only area MSNBC has taken a serious hit. They also dropped 34% in the total day demo compared to where they were a year ago. Jen Psaki has been the hardest hit. She was given the show back on May 5. They thought she was gonna be a huge draw. They thought Jen Psaki would surpass Rachel Maddow's success. That didn't happen. It's been quite the opposite. According to the Daily Mail, the latest rate ratings for the briefing with Jen Psaki came in on May 22 when it failed to crack the coveted 1,000,000 viewer mark. Wow. Hannity had 2,300,000 total viewers that night. Jen Psaki performed dismally in the twenty five fifty four, age demographic, only pulling in alright. Now alright. Now listen to this. Jen Psaki, national show on in every single market on television. Got 55,000 viewers in the twenty five to fifty four demographic. 55,000. Now this is a national show. It's a national show. I have more listeners than that total total market, And I'm not making anywhere near Jen Psaki's, salary on this thing. That's unbelievable. That I always thought I I mean and I know you guys think that that when these people are on the edges, millions of people are tuning in every night, but they're not. Only 55,000 ages 25 to 54 are tuning in ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • The Charlie James Show on Thursday May 29 2025 - Hour 4, Segment 1 (6:00PM)
    2025/05/29
    Understand. I don't understand why the people at MSNBC don't get it. These network executives, they just don't understand what's going on. They don't know how to run the a a media company. That's that's obvious. Now they fired Joy Reid at MSNBC. Okay. We were all okay with that. Nobody was crying over Joy Reid losing her job. The most racist person on on cable television. But they replaced her with probably the second whitest woman on the planet. Now we all know that Elizabeth Warren is the whitest woman in the world. In fact, she did a DNA test. That was so funny, because president Trump started calling her Pocahontas. So she went out and she got one of those DNA tests because she claimed that she was Native American. Even on her Texas bar license, she put down her race as Native American. She was listen. I forget which college she went through, but it but in in their list of dignitaries, they actually claimed that she was the first woman of color. What? If that color is ivory, then yes. So she's the she's the whitest woman on the planet. The second whitest woman on the planet is Jen Psaki. They replaced Joy Reid with Jen Psaki. Now I am shocked that activists all over the country didn't just lose their minds. I'm surprised that Al Sharpton didn't come out against MSNBC. I'm surprised that all of these people, E Elie Mistall, all these folks out there didn't just rise up against MSNBC because they replaced well, they didn't replace her, but they yeah. Well, they they fired Joy Reid. They promoted Jen Psaki. Well, now Jen Psaki is doing the Tuesday through Friday show in the 9PM time slot. That used to be and still kind of is Rachel Maddow's time slot. Now Rachel Maddow was doing the show for $25,000,000 a year. Five nights a week, one hour. Good gracious. I could do a one hour show standing on my head. And she went from 25,000,000, 5 nights a week. They cut her salary to 20,000,000, and she only does Monday nights. That's it. Now granted, she was on the air five nights a week during the first hundred days of the Trump administration, and she had to hate that. But could you imagine getting $20,000,000 a year to do a one hour a week show? I gotta talk to my agent. Man, that's some serious money there. Well, MSNBC's thought that they were doing something smart. They put gin sake on Tuesday through Friday, and that turns out to be a disaster. Just weeks after Emma this is from trending politics. Just weeks after MSNBC debuted its brand new prime time lineup in an attempt to salvage plummeting viewership. Audiences made clear their feelings about the direction, and it's not positive for the network. Over the course of May, the outlet has plummeted 41% in viewership in key demographics. That's not the only area MSNBC has taken a serious hit. They also dropped 34% in the total day demo compared to where they were a year ago. Jen Psaki has been the hardest hit. She was given the show back on May 5. They thought she was gonna be a huge draw. They thought Jen Psaki would surpass Rachel Maddow's success. That didn't happen. It's been quite the opposite. According to the Daily Mail, the latest rate ratings for the briefing with Jen Psaki came in on May 22 when it failed to crack the coveted 1,000,000 viewer mark. Wow. Hannity had 2,300,000 total viewers that night. Jen Psaki performed dismally in the twenty five fifty four, age demographic, only pulling in alright. Now alright. Now listen to this. Jen Psaki, national show on in every single market on television. Got 55,000 viewers in the twenty five to fifty four demographic. 55,000. Now this is a national show. It's a national show. I have more listeners than that total total market, And I'm not making anywhere near Jen Psaki's, salary on this thing. That's unbelievable. That I always thought I I mean and I know you guys think that that when these people are on the edges, millions of people are tuning in every night, but they're not. Only 55,000 ages 25 to 54 are tunin ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • The Charlie James Show on Thursday May 29 2025 - Hour 3 (5:00PM)
    2025/05/29
    I started out the show today by, asking the question, do the Republicans in Washington really want to win the midterms? Do they really wanna win the mid? I don't think they do. I I really don't. Somebody said that Republicans really like when they're in the minority. You know why? You know why? They get more money. They get more donations. They get more people saying, oh, go fight these. Oh, you go. You're putting up such a good fight against these Democrats. I'm gonna write you a check. And then we'll get out there, and we all remember we all remember the midterms under Joe Biden. Republicans were still a minority, but they always promised that we're gonna use the power of the purse. We're gonna stop all of these Biden initiatives. We're gonna use the power of the purse. And when did they do it? Not a single time. Not one time did they use the power of the purse. So I'm never ever ever going to listen to a a a Republican that says they're gonna use the power of the purse again. You say that, I mean, I'm gonna write you off. Okay? You're automatically written off. In fact, I narrated or I moderated the third congressional district debate. And we had I think we had five or six candidates there. Only one was missing in that debate in in Saluda. And I asked a question on stage. I said, would you be willing to use the power of the purse to stop the Biden initiatives even up to shutting down the government? I'd asked that of all of the candidates. And of all well, I believe it was six on stage, only one said they would. Only one said that they would be willing to go as far as shutting down the government to stop Joe Biden's policies. And that was Mark Burns. He was the only one that would say that. You see, the GOP is, cowards. They're gutless. They want everybody to like them. They want the Democrats to like them. Even though this president has the full support of the American people and this full support of the people that vote Republican. Listen to this is Harry Enten over on CNN. Listen to what he says about what president Trump is doing with Harvard. This is very interesting. I I think going into this, I think a lot of Americans thought that higher ed needed a nice kick in the rear end. What am I talking about here? Well, why don't we take a look at high confidence in education. Look at where we are now. That number has plummeted, plummeted as of last year, down to 36%. We're talking about a 36 drop among Republicans, specifically. About a 36 drop among Republicans specifically. Get this. 68% of Americans said that higher education was on the wrong track. So it's a question of whether or not people agree with Trump's tactics, but they definitely agree with him on the idea that there is a problem with higher ed overall. One thing you've heard from president Trump and many Republican allies for quite some time is accusing colleges and universities across the country of not being a friendly place for conservatives, if you will. How do the American public feel? Yeah. So, you know, do colleges have a liberal bias? I I think that's really the question here. And what we see in polling after polling after polling is that the plurality say yes. Overall, look at that. 45% of Americans overall agree with the idea that colleges have a liberal bias. Just 24% disagree with that idea. Look among Republicans. Hello. 67% of Republicans agree that colleges have a liberal bias. This is why Donald Trump is so emphatic and so wanting to take on this fight because he knows that Republicans hate universities, hate the administrations, Republicans hate universities, hate the administrations, believe they have a liberal bias, and in fact, the plurality of Americans overall agree with the idea, agree with Donald Trump that colleges are in fact the place where bias reigns. And it does reign. It does reign. So 67% of Republican voters say, we like what Donald Trump is doing to Harvard. Why isn't Congress jumping on the bandwagon? This m ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    32 分

The Charlie James Show Podcastに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。