『The Leadership Japan Series』のカバーアート

The Leadership Japan Series

The Leadership Japan Series

著者: Dr. Greg Story
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Leading in Japan is distinct and different from other countries. The language, culture and size of the economy make sure of that. We can learn by trial and error or we can draw on real world practical experience and save ourselves a lot of friction, wear and tear. This podcasts offers hundreds of episodes packed with value, insights and perspectives on leading here. The only other podcast on Japan which can match the depth and breadth of this Leadership Japan Series podcast is the Japan's Top Business interviews podcast.© 2022 Dale Carnegie Training. All Rights Reserved. マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ 経済学
エピソード
  • To SER With Love
    2025/06/25
    To SER With Love In the movie “To Sir, With Love”, Sidney Poitier was brilliant in the role of a black teacher in a tough London East End high school. He was trying to make a difference for these young outcasts to better prepare them for the life they would face after graduating from school. A very uplifting story about what is possible when we encourage others to be their best. So what has this got to do with business, you may be asking? As leaders, we have four jobs. Run the machinery of the operation so everything works well, provide the vision on where we are going, explain the WHY and build our people. This “build our people” part is a communications exercise which most leaders fail to do well enough, myself included. Many of us grew up in business in a era when your boss just expected you to get on with your job. No encouragement was needed, because you were required to do a full day’s work for a full day’s pay. Praise didn't exist and you found your own sources of encouragement. Things are different today, but are we skilled enough in the best practice techniques of giving honest praise and encouragement? This is where the acronym SER comes in. “S” is strength, “E” is for evidence and “R” for relevance. It is a useful formula to remember when you want recognize the good work done by one of your team. “Strengths” are interesting because most bosses are laser beam focused on identifying weaknesses and fixing them. They are “error finders” as opposed to “good work finders”, when looking at how people carry out their tasks. They are searching for defects, time delays, poor quality, unsatisfactory performance, cost overruns and basic idiocy. If we switch our mindset and look for strengths, then we completely change how we see our people. That automatically changes how we communicate with them. Now words strung together like “good job” are a complete waste of time. Please - don’t even bother saying them. The person on the receiving end is fully aware they are doing many things in their work, but still have no clear idea which particular bit they are doing well. We need to be highly specific about which aspect of their work we are recognizing. This is how our words have impact. “Evidence” is critical to demonstrate that the boss has been paying attention and has noticed good work is being performed. By referring to specific actions, decisions, outputs etc., the staff member knows the words coming out of their boss’s mouth are real and not flattery, propaganda or an attempt to snow them into believing the boss is nicer than they really are. Every piece of work is made up of separate tasks, so the idea is to select a particular task that was done well and single it out for praise. You could say, “Greg, good work on the report”. Or you could say, “Greg, thank you for your work on the proposal for the client. That was one of the best I have seen. You assembled the evidence very comprehensively and you argued the case very convincingly. I am sure the client was impressed by the professional level of the work they received from you”. It is obvious which one we want to receive. So, if it so obvious, why aren’t we communicating our feedback like this? “Relevancy” is a key step that 99% of bosses who do manage to offer some praise and recognition completely fail to mention. We have to recognize the work, offer our evidence to make the praise credible and then take it one important step further. We need to link the good work being done to the bigger picture. That can be for the firm’s future, but it is much more powerful if it is linked to WIIFM. “What’s In It For Me” is a powerful driver of employee self-interest. The secret is to select that piece of excellent work and then link it to how that is going to help that person succeed in their business and career. For example, “ Greg, your ability to source key data and then back it up with clear, concise language is a real skill. That is the type of skill our company values highly. It also means that you can have impact in your current role. This is the calibre of person we want to make a future leader in our organization. I know you are working hard and keep going with what you are doing, because you are differentiating yourself in a powerful and positive way. This will be a big help to you in your career”. If you are hearing that comment, you are going to be fired up to try even harder and push even further. “Greg, good job” pales in comparison doesn’t it. Even worse, when nothing has been said at all, because working hard is expected around here, there has clearly been a major lost opportunity to engage your team members. What is required? That most valuable of all resources – “boss time”. We have to make the time to become “good finders” and then take the time to communicate it using the SER ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Common Leader Achilles’ Heels
    2025/06/19

    We know the name Achilles because of Brad Pitt and Hollywood or we may have read the Iliad. He was a famous mythical Greek hero whose body was invulnerable, except for the back of his heel. His mother plunged him into the river Styx to protect his body, but her fingertips covered the heel, leaving it vulnerable. Research by Dr. Jack Zenger identified four common elements which comprise Achilles’ heels for leaders. Blind spots are a problem for all of us. We can’t see our foibles, issues and problems, but they are blindingly obvious to everyone else working for us. Remember, subordinates are all expert “boss watchers”. They examine us in the greatest detail every day, in every interaction. Let’s examine what Zenger found and see what we can learn as leaders.

    1. Lacking Integrity

    Not too many leaders would be saying they lacked integrity about themselves but that may not be how they are seen by their subordinates. The organization may be zigging but we decide to zag. We don’t agree with the policy, so we decide to head off in another direction. There may be promulgated values developed in the senior executive suites and we are not modelling the correct behaviour. Maybe our big leader egos can’t admit mistakes or when we are wrong. We try to bend logic and justify our way out of the situation. Maybe we say one thing and do the precise opposite of what we are preaching. “Do what I say, not what I do” – does this sound familiar?

    1. Not Accountable

    “Of course, I am accountable – what nonsense”, may be our first reaction. We may be telling our boss that the poor results of our team are because we haven’t been issued with the sharpest tools in the toolbox. It is all their fault and we are pristine and perfect. The 360 survey results are a bloodbath, as our subordinates hoe into us for our various failings, but we dismiss the results. “Piffle. Don’t they know what I am facing here. The pressure, the stress. No one appreciates how hard I am working. They have no idea what they are talking about”. Perhaps our decisions are poor and instead of owning them, we push the blame off on to others, particularly other departments. “If only IT did their job properly. If only marketing were more professional. If only sales was pulling their weight”, ad nauseum.

    1. Over-Focused On Self

    It would be difficult to find leaders who don’t have this attribute to varying degrees. You don’t see too many wilting violets whisked up into leadership positions. Self-promotion is a fundamental aspect of getting ahead in business. The issues arise when it goes to extremes. Strong leaders can often believe they are in a zero sum game and another’s success lessens their own worth and promotion opportunities. Not cooperating with rivals or even attempting to sabotage them can be some fallout from this attitude. Subordinates too can be seen as future rivals who might replace the boss, so better to not delegate to, coach or provide experience for capable people in order to keep them down.

    1. Uninspiring

    It would be a rare bird of a leader who admitted they were uninspiring. We easily believe we are a role model for others, that we have credibility and are someone others would want to emulate. However, we might be a hopeless public speaker, barely able to string two words together without injecting a series of ums and ahs into proceedings. We might be morose, weighed down with the pressure of our position and responsibilities, permanently in a bad mood. We might be so busy, we are incapable of directing others and wind up dumping work on them minus the WHY and the how bits of the equation.

    There is a bitter pill for leaders to swallow to overcome their blind spots. It is called “feedback” and it can often taste sour, jagged and unpleasant. We cannot see ourselves as our staff see us, so gird your loins and ask for help to be a better leader. This is never easy, but the alternative of blundering forward, repeating the same errors is not tenable. At some point the organization will have a reckoning with us and it might prove fatal to our careers. Better to take our medicine early, under our own direction, than hoping for the best and eventually getting the chop.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Are You Authentically Aggressive Or Assertive As A Leader
    2025/06/11

    In today’s business world, leaders need to be “authentic” leaders. We have all come across this somewhere, endorsed by self-proclaimed gurus and prophets. I often ponder what does that actually mean? I am sure all of those Japanese leaders screaming abuse at their staff, when they make mistakes, are being authentic. They are authentically terrible, dictatorial, abusive leaders. Actually this worked like a charm for a very long time in postwar Japan. You joined a company for life and there was only one route for those who changed jobs and that was down into a netherworld of strife, insecurity and lower salary. In the goode olde days you had to dodge the flying ashtrays thrown at you by your authentically enraged boss, endure their publicly delivered abuse and keep going. Yamaichi Securities going down in 1997, made changing jobs mid-career respectable for the first time for those who became unemployed through no fault of their own.

    Can a boss be passive at the other end of the scale? No. Bosses have to lead the charge, set the direction, check on the milestones, monitor the performance and drive results. They have to praise those who are doing a fantastic job or have a difficult conversation with those who are failing. Where is the line between aggression and assertion though. One boss’s idea of assertion is aggressive power harassment from an employee’s perspective. In years past this didn’t matter much, because there were plenty of people to go around and it was “my way or the highway”. Today, we are rapidly running out of young people. There is a temporary pause in hostilities in the talent war here in Japan, which will shortly resume, once Covid is brought under control.

    Aggressive bosses are self centered, concerned about their career and how they look to their bosses. Assertive bosses will stand up for their team and themselves vis-à-vis the big bosses and sharp elbowed thrusting rivals. They have a 360 degree view of what is going on and how actions affect the whole organisation, rather than focused on the needs of one aggressive individual.

    Aggressive bosses are often lashing out because they cannot control the stress and pressure they are under. They play a toxic version of “pass the parcel” and take it out on their subordinates. Assertive leaders know how to keep calm. They have techniques for handling the stress. They realise that their dark, erratic, satanic moods can destroy the motivation and equilibrium of the team. They are the swan bosses paddling like crazy under the waterline but moving elegantly through the days no matter what is on.

    Aggressive bosses believe their job is to tell errant staff “how it is” and be very blunt and direct in their speech. Assertive bosses can be honest and direct with subordinates but the language they choose doesn’t become inappropriate or demotivating. They know they need this person to recover and get back into the fray and try again, even though their self-confidence is shattered by their poor work output. When your young staff are useless you can’t easily replace them, so your job becomes to help them become useful.

    Aggressive bosses often have deep underlying poor self esteem, which is why they lash out and whip people verbally. They need to establish their supreme dominance over the team and fear is their weapon of choice. Assertive leaders have a confident self-image and good awareness of their strengths and weakness. They are at home in their own skin and don’t feel the need to constantly prove themselves or beat up their staff. Rather they are looking for ways to further develop their team. They know they are stuck right where they are, until they can groom successors which will free them up for promotion to bigger jobs. Every firm needs leaders. The person who is the leadership factory is going to be given more accountability within the organisation.

    I think words like “authentic” need to have more nuanced meanings. What we are really talking about is someone who is honest, transparent, confident, considerate and a builder of people, because they believe that is the best thing for everyone. Being an “authentic “bully in this era in Japan, will be a career ender once the top leadership work out this person is a sieve, rapidly leaking talent out of the organisation to rival firms.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分

The Leadership Japan Seriesに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。